Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miami Meltdown: Tempers Flare As Pacers Hammer Heat

Week 5 Blogpoll Ballot

Four games in, here's my resume ranking (meaning: not a power poll) of the sport's top 25.

Star-divide

SB Nation BlogPoll Top 25 College Football Rankings

The Purple Wimple Ballot - Week 5

Rank Team Delta
1 Boise St. Broncos Arrow_up 12
2 Alabama Crimson Tide Arrow_up 2
3 Oklahoma Sooners Arrow_down -2
4 TCU Horned Frogs Arrow_up 14
5 Auburn Tigers --
6 Ohio St. Buckeyes Arrow_down -3
7 LSU Tigers Arrow_up 3
8 Stanford Cardinal Arrow_up 11
9 N.C. State Wolfpack Arrow_up 12
10 Arizona Wildcats Arrow_down -3
11 Florida Gators Arrow_up 1
12 Michigan St. Spartans Arrow_down -4
13 Utah Utes Arrow_down -7
14 Nevada Wolf Pack --
15 Oklahoma St. Cowboys Arrow_down -4
16 Michigan Wolverines Arrow_up 1
17 Nebraska Cornhuskers Arrow_down -8
18 USC Trojans Arrow_down -4
19 Kansas St. Wildcats Arrow_up 3
20 Oregon Ducks --
21 Air Force Falcons --
22 Arkansas Razorbacks --
23 Toledo Rockets --
24 Texas Longhorns Arrow_down -22
25 South Carolina Gamecocks Arrow_down -10
Dropouts: Fresno St. Bulldogs, Temple Owls, West Virginia Mountaineers, Wisconsin Badgers, Missouri Tigers

SB Nation BlogPoll College Football Top 25 Rankings "

My next five: Temple, Florida State, Penn State, Virginia Tech, Missouri.

Remember, I'm resume polling, so I don't care if your favorite Big 10+1+1 team is projected to challenge the Buckeyes for the title. What matters to me is wins and losses already in the bag, so if your ESPN-annointed squad only has beaten UNLV, San Jose State, a 2A team, and needed the luck of St. Vincent to beat Arizona State, that's just not a "Rank me! Highly!" resume.

My three rules are these: Rule #1: I make exceptions to all of the following rules, as I see fit, except for Rule #2. Rule #2: for at least one week, the winner of a game must outrank the loser of the same game. Rule #3A: We cannot measure a team’s quality until it beats a quality opponent. (I understand that the "quality opponent" is subjective, and I’ve gotten over it. So should you.) Rule #3B: Beating a 2A team is usually a meaningless exercise.

So my big movers in this week's ballot were Boise State, TCU, Stanford, NC State, going up, and Utah, Nebraska, Texas, and South Carolina, going down. Boise showed more of what we all are learning to live with-- they're simply outstanding in all phases, including kick-you-in-the-nuts meanness. Given the vulnerability shown by most of the other contenders, I would pick Boise over any other team in the nation in a this-weekend matchup for all the marbles.

TCU, Stanford, and NC State are all showing domination on the road in emotional games, in sharp contrast with the big losers in my week 5 ballot. The first of which is: Texas, which wilted at home against UCLA's new pistol offense. Granted, there's no love lost from me for Texas in its 22-place fall on my ballot; but the Longhorn's best win (the roadie in Lubbock) is almost completely negated by the loss in Austin. South Carolina, which fought manfully on the road against Auburn, now boasts Southern Miss as its best scalp on the wall. (Sorry, SEC and ESPN, but Georgia just isn't a quality win anymore.)

A few more one-loss teams appear on my ballot this week: Air Force, Arkansas, and Toledo. The Falcons followed up their emotional what-if in Norman last week with a suffocating (but not flashy) win in Laramie; Arkansas's near-miss is well documented; and Toledo (with a lot of help from injuries) added Purdue to its resume, having already beaten two of the best teams in the MAC.

Final notes: Nebraska and Oregon get a no-confidence ranking from me this week, coming it at 17th and 20th, respectively. Both are still undefeated, but both narrowly won in games each ought to have won by very large margins. The Huskers' best win is still Idaho, which may not even be a bowl team this year, and Oregon's best skins on the wall are from the dregs of the SEC and the Pac 10. Not a championship resume, Ducks, especially compared to what Arizona, Stanford, and USC have done to date.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Frogs O' War

TCU 2011 Outlook-- Defense

May 2011 by Purple Wimple - 0 comments

BYU 2011 Outlook

May 2011 by Purple Wimple - 2 comments

Comments

Display:

Oregon and TCU have very similar resumes, except one thing. While Tennessee is showing they weren’t as good as they were last year, at least Oregon traveled to Knoxville and beat them there. TCU hasn’t gotten out of the FWD area yet. Their win over ASU was very similar to the TCU win over SMU. Oregon used turnovers to win that game too.

If you’re going to shoot TCU 14 spots up, you should consider similar treatment to Oregon.

Also, Oklahoma’s first three wins came in Norman. Their last win came on the road against Cincinnati who is pedestrian at best. Is their resume any better than Stanford who has two solid road wins against UCLA and Notre Dame?

I respect your right to invoke rule 1.

by Adam S. on Sep 27, 2010 12:14 PM CDT reply actions  

While cartel-shills will go apoplectic at the following, I will stand by it: beating SMU in Dallas is better than beating Tennessee in Knoxville. SMU probably will go bowling, and has a quarterback and runningback and line worth paying attention to. Tennessee…. probably won’t and doesn’t. So I consider TCU’s resume better than Tennessee’s. And to say TCU “also” used turnovers to beat SMU shows that you did not watch the game. TCU overcame turnovers and beat SMU by grinding the Mustangs into the ground with superior line play and a dominant running game. That’s why I say a good running game covers a multitude of sins.

Next: OU’s and Stanford’s resumes are pretty similar. Winning on the road against UCLA and Cincy are very equivalent— UCLA had the splashy win in Austin last week, but hasn’t otherwise impressed; but the win bumps them up a smidge; Oklahoma barely got by Cincy— which is a feather in Cincy’s cap, so I call those equivalent. And: beating Notre Dame isn’t looking very difficult anymore, Little Giants or not. Beating Air Force is more impressive, methinks.

Fact is, there just isn’t enough data yet for all of these apples-to-orange comparisons to work. Four games, many against 2A teams, ain’t enough.

by Ezra Hood on Sep 28, 2010 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Doesn’t rule 2 require that UCLA be ranked ahead of Texas, at least for this week?

by grmann on Sep 27, 2010 9:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Oh my, yes it does. Thanks for the catch. I’ll adjust my ballot accordingly, by unranking Texas and moving up my 26th team into the 25th spot.

by Ezra Hood on Sep 28, 2010 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SBNation's blog for the TCU Horned Frogs.

Managers

Mean_ol__horned_frog_small Purple Wimple

Painting1_small HawkeyedFrog

Photo-66883_small FungoFrog

Editors

Treytwitterlogo_small Trey Fallon